Ron
Super Member
Joined:September 2012
Posts: 3,748
Location:
Likes: 5,835
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 28, 2024 10:26:26 GMT
|
Post by Ron on Dec 20, 2014 15:14:46 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Joined:January 1970
Posts: 0
Location:
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 29, 2024 5:37:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2014 13:12:40 GMT
I don't need to swear to insult someone or get my point across.....LOL
|
|
Deleted
Joined:January 1970
Posts: 0
Location:
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 29, 2024 5:37:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2014 19:32:57 GMT
"Anyone suggesting that e-cigarettes might not have a helpful role to play in reducing the harm caused by cigarettes" is a f**king idiot.....!
|
|
Deleted
Joined:January 1970
Posts: 0
Location:
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 29, 2024 5:37:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2014 19:42:14 GMT
I don't need to swear to insult someone or get my point across.....LOL I swear because I care
|
|
jeffc
Super Member
Joined:November 2012
Posts: 3,257
Location:
Likes: 2,946
Recent Posts
Last Online Jan 25, 2021 11:44:03 GMT
|
Post by jeffc on Dec 21, 2014 19:49:39 GMT
The "failed mechanic" (Glantz) has no scientific or medical qualifications. "Bubblegum" (Martin McKee) has a proven record of `good` in PH, but is in a time warp regarding his lack of knowledge of e-cigarettes. "Windy Aussie" Simon Chapman has knowledge of wind turbine technology, but his supposed knowledge of e- cigarettes is virtually nil and is a laughing stock in this field. All named are surviving on grants, by the Pharmaceutical companies. No more needs to be said. "TROLLS", and `poor ones at that`.
|
|
Deleted
Joined:January 1970
Posts: 0
Location:
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 29, 2024 5:37:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2014 20:35:07 GMT
Maybe they need to try sub ohming on a vamo 2 LOL
|
|
Bobsbeer
Super Member
Having a glass of wine and a vape
Joined:November 2014
Posts: 3,469
Location:
Likes: 2,612
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 13, 2020 6:07:23 GMT
|
Post by Bobsbeer on Dec 21, 2014 21:12:55 GMT
The problem I see with most academic articles is that they always seem to say there is no evidence to show no or little harm or efficacy. As a result they tend to use the phrase "... there is insufficient evidence..." They tend to ignore the evidence that there is in favour of reports with a negative slant. I was reading an editorial in The Lancet, dated 6 September 2014 ( HERE)with a similar slat. Yet there is evidence that they choose to ignore. Which brings me to the conclusion that the 'do gooders' will be rushing to get bans and regulations before the evidence emerges. Because they know that in the end they will be made to look like fools if they wait till the evidence is in. I feel we are on a loosing battle until the positive blind study evidence gets published.
|
|
jeffc
Super Member
Joined:November 2012
Posts: 3,257
Location:
Likes: 2,946
Recent Posts
Last Online Jan 25, 2021 11:44:03 GMT
|
Post by jeffc on Dec 21, 2014 21:20:20 GMT
|
|