right all gonna hate me but been offered the Hcigar hb dna40

[letsavit]

Jun 3, 2015 11:53:17 GMT banditruss said:

hi all recieved the h cigar hb dna40 ....well chuffed with it cant wait to get my temp sensor tanks from slowtech now....they're on there way ...usung itwith sub tank atm o.5 dont know why but think its better than my ivp mini 2 70w...mind you tried ot ripshods smok bec pro as well yesterday and thought that was better too ...dont know if they are or just a case of new toys are better ! lol ohhh and Glen ....im getting there heres a pic of the kamry..humm just one bit to find ..or make !

If the DNA is reading the ohms wrong the ground screw might need tightening, easy job... Tag me here or PM and I'll do I pic....

Anyway enjoy and nice kamry....

[banditruss]

hi letsavit thx not sure if dna is reading ohms wrong reads higher than on other device but only slightly as in prob .2 to.4 higher ,i didn't know if it was just more accurate..but if there's an 'upgrade' or something to check that would be great to hear ...always like to have things working to their best thx for help

[banditruss]

hi all just an interesting note on the h cigar hb dna40 against the ivp mini 2 70w i was using out of interest just did a back to back test both on new batteries the same ,again same subtank mini and juice on .7 coil and while the dna40 was using 24w nicely the ivp just burnt up had to drop to about 17w to equal the dna40...so even though the ivp has more power its less usable where as the dna has less more but needs to use more ...any thoughts ,i know ive not used the temp control as still awaiting tanks,,,but thought it was an interesting comparison, seems the ivp is very strong/harse on power where as the dna is more subtle and even though running higher watts is more smooth anyone have any thoughts on this ?
cheers russ

[VapingBad]

Jun 5, 2015 16:19:38 GMT banditruss said:

hi all just an interesting note on the h cigar hb dna40 against the ivp mini 2 70w i was using out of interest just did a back to back test both on new batteries the same ,again same subtank mini and juice on .7 coil and while the dna40 was using 24w nicely the ivp just burnt up had to drop to about 17w to equal the dna40...so even though the ivp has more power its less usable where as the dna has less more but needs to use more ...any thoughts ,i know ive not used the temp control as still awaiting tanks,,,but thought it was an interesting comparison, seems the ivp is very strong/harse on power where as the dna is more subtle and even though running higher watts is more smooth anyone have any thoughts on this ?
cheers russ

When I put an IPV 2 on the ociloscope it was seriously over powered and had a large voltage spike at the start of every vape. Maybe it works for them overpowering I have read how people like the SX Mini M seems to have more omph than the DNA for a particular setting (they calibrated the tempreture so it get much hotter, maybe the power to).