Doesn't sound right

[VapingBad]

Aug 19, 2014 6:44:57 GMT Perpetua said:

Aug 19, 2014 0:41:41 GMT decoy said:

its prob tw and they rate there juice nic strange so its prob 10mg

It may be a little higher going by their chart:






Though it's pretty unforgivable to be selling a complete newbie, kit that most of us consider to be ' advanced '.


I'd be advising your friend to take it back for a full refund and buy something far more suitable for her current needs beetle and that she's likely to have more success with starting out.

Good find Perpetua, but that chart does seem to ignore maths somewhat for Titan Fluid.

[Ripshod]

I've got to reflect the general feeling in this thread. Bad advice and profiteering prices will never get anyone of ciggies, unless by good luck.

Encourage your friend to sign up here, or ask on their behalf.

tbh shops like this only make money from people who want a 'quick fix'. Always, I reiterate always, and I reiterate the reiteration - seek advice from people with experience rather than a B&M store that isn't approved. We have a list on here of GOOD vendors that is kept up to date. Make use of it.

Better to wait a few days than waste money.

But then human nature makes the wait really hard. Better to smoke a few ciggies than waste money.

[/RANT]

[beetle]

I agree that the price is pretty steep, the juice was not the best choice and it's questionable whether a VTR is the right kit to sell to a new vaper. The reason I didn't elaborate more on those points is because I didn't want them to detract from the main question about what I thought was the most important concern, which was battery safety. Personally, I think it is profiteering but I can only go on hearsay. Would have been a different outcome had I been there. Yes, she said the price stung and it's rather hefty but she is not unhappy with it and is content to keep it as a ''at home'' device. We all know that the VTR is a good mod/doorstop/knuckle-duster/ emergency make-up mirror (apparently). I've provided her with links to trusted vendors and she'll be getting a vv Spinner for out and about, some decent juice and a good quality charger (thanks igual, VapingBad).

The battery is a re-branded Samsung, which ties in to the naming and shaming that has been suggested. I'd rather not point to a specific address, as I wasn't physically there to witness the exchange but suffice to say, on a general note, this company has been known to be litigious against criticism and is known to be devilishly pricey.
I know it's infuriating when things like this happen but I guess the best we can do is try and nip the bulls**t in the bud when we see it but at the same time avoiding witch-hunts, which can quickly get out of hand.

Anyway, I've waffled on enough. Thanks for the great feedback and suggestions.