Boxin Dna 75

[VapingBad]

I have never noticed a difference between my two long term goto builds (0.05 and 0.24 ohm) in terms of battery life. The highest ohm build I have on the go is 0.276, pretty close to 0.3 and again not noticed a difference between that and the 0.05 in terms of battery life.

[Get Off My Cloud]

May 1, 2017 12:58:21 GMT VapingBad said:

I have never noticed a difference between my two long term goto builds (0.05 and 0.24 ohm) in terms of battery life. The highest ohm build I have on the go is 0.276, pretty close to 0.3 and again not noticed a difference between that and the 0.05 in terms of battery life.

Like i said i have no explanation for it, it's just what i've experienced, maybe it's peculiar to power mode only i've no idea as i never vape in TC mode.

[dalealan]

Talked myself out of it by thinking either a DNA 133/166 would be better.

[VapingBad]

May 1, 2017 19:04:03 GMT dalealan said:

Talked myself out of it by thinking either a DNA 133/166 would be better.

I would go for a 166 for a two battery mod, better board than the 75 and much faster charging than the 133.

[dalealan]

May 1, 2017 20:10:00 GMT VapingBad said:

May 1, 2017 19:04:03 GMT dalealan said:

Talked myself out of it by thinking either a DNA 133/166 would be better.

I would go for a 166 for a two battery mod, better board than the 75 and much faster charging than the 133.

Ooh thanks for the heads up vb. I thought they all had 2a charging. Looks like it'll be a 166 if I can get one cheap enough,

[striker42]

I bought a C1D2 DNA75. 3500mah 26650 battery 0.4 ohm @ 45w and very happy with the battery life.

[VapingBad]

The 200/133 boards have 1 A on the USB side or 5 W (1 A x 5 V).
The 75 boards have 1 A on the battery side, about 0.8 A on the USB side and around 4 W.
The 250/166 boards have 2 A on the USB side or 10 W (2 A x 5 V).

You always get a little less because of voltage drop in the USB cable and connectors, but 250/166 are a lot easier to live with, you can get a good few hours worth of charge in in 20 mins.

[VapingBad]

The 75s are not bad on battery, but they are on the lower end off efficiency scale at 85%, compared to a 200 which is 97%, a DNA 40 in in-between at 92%.

[dalealan]

May 1, 2017 20:23:17 GMT VapingBad said:

The 75s are not bad on battery, but they are on the lower end off efficiency scale at 85%, compared to a 200 which is 97%, a DNA 40 in in-between at 92%.

Definitely fancy something higher powered as I don't want to push it to the limit and sometimes go above 75 watts occasionally. Time to have a hunt for any cheap 166s but I won't hold me breath