MrDJ
Super Member
Joined:April 2015
Posts: 1,458
Location:
Likes: 1,189
Recent Posts
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:14:27 GMT
|
Post by MrDJ on Mar 7, 2018 17:50:08 GMT
FACT! and the oscar for scaremongering goes to......the daily mail. after the latest report by the daily mail about ecigs causing cancer........ ok i will stop it there and actually not talk about that as we all know its fake news. what i will say is thanks to someone that has got way too much time on their hands they have compiled a list. not any normal list i must add. a list of things that has been reported by the daily fail that causes cancer. yes there are some that we know of like asbestos but there also some chestnuts that you couldnt make up if you tried. www.anorak.co.uk/288298/tabloids/the-daily-mails-list-of-things-that-give-you-cancer-from-a-to-z.html/
|
|
prr
Super Member
Joined:March 2013
Posts: 3,100
Location:
Likes: 2,972
Recent Posts
Last Online May 29, 2018 17:30:19 GMT
|
Post by prr on Mar 7, 2018 20:09:47 GMT
Being a man or being a woman!!!!, in the words of private Wilson in Dad's army " we're doomed". What a tunch of bossers!
|
|
ghostrider1971
Super Member
Joined:July 2016
Posts: 1,876
Location:
Likes: 2,004
Recent Posts
Last Online Aug 24, 2018 16:42:26 GMT
|
Post by ghostrider1971 on Mar 7, 2018 20:23:53 GMT
Typical Daily Fail headlines over 7 days...
Day 1 - "Drink coffee everyday and you will live forever"
Day 7 - "Anyone who has drunk coffee this week is going to die in 10 minutes"
Scaremongering, gutter "journalism" of the worse variety.
|
|
|
Post by Chrissie on Mar 7, 2018 21:26:29 GMT
Completely agree the daily Fail is just scaremongering, gutter "journalism" of the worse kind (add the Sun to that description also). Sadly so many people believe every word they print
|
|
joeten
Super Member
Joined:February 2016
Posts: 3,079
Location:
Likes: 1,893
Recent Posts
Last Online Jan 9, 2021 18:38:42 GMT
|
Post by joeten on Mar 8, 2018 0:11:40 GMT
There seem to be less and less actual reporters/journalists who do the research required now. google is as far as they go for a source and there secondary source would be the second on the list google provides.
|
|