Recent Posts

I do have another unit. The vendor was excellent, sent a replacement and allowed me the pleasure of keeping the faulty unit to strip it and see what was causing the problem. 
You do make a few valid points regarding the 510 but, what I'm about to say is not penned to cause an argument, more open debate on how things could have been so much better. If you think I'm talking shite, just tell me , I can hack it.
The seal at the 510 is created by compression, the battery pushes the contact up and the RDA pushes the 510 pin down on a tiny spring, clamped between two pieces of plastic, which means the current (I think that's the terminology) passes through that spring as the positive connector. Has that spring been manufactured to serve that purpose or is it a case of, it can serve that purpose so that'll do ? 
Here is the Biggie for me. This was the be all and end all of squonking, at the forefront of innovation............................topfill , yup................topfill. The rest is pretty much still the same crap we've been served up in the past. Why didn't they go with a 510 system incorporating something like this




Ok, I know it's a bit big, but I'm sure something of this nature could have been manufactured to be used for squonking. Side feed and a blanked bottom end whereby the only place it could leak is where the squonk hose connects to it. That could have been housed in the bottle side where any leaks would not be pouring down the bay where the board and electrics are situated. Like all these reviewer backed projects, it's all about the $ $ $. If you watch the TVC video, it only shows you what he wants you to know. 
At the end of the day, I was looking for something nice to replace my much loved but battered RSQ, guess I should just have bought another RSQ.