Is the daily Fail changing it's stance?

[seniorphil]

I believe they have changed their mind because financialy they couldn't afford to do otherwise. The same article printed in a magazine would of had to have "advertising feature" printed small at the top of each page, because of the obvious product placement. They can release it on the internet without declaring an interest. I wonder who they've signed a advertising deal with???

[djs]

I have the genuine paper copy in my hand....

Either E-lites are all over this, or they will have been asked to allow a picture of the product to be used.

A large proportion of e-cig articles I have found includes comments from E-Lites, or the famous Mr Everett.

I always enjoy reading his comments.

Adrian Everett, a co-founder and director of E-Lites, said: “We’ve seen an extraordinary increase in sales of our highly advanced smoke-free and tobacco-free electronic cigarettes, which offer smokers a healthier, cheaper and unrestricted alternative to conventional cigarettes.

Highly advanced?

[djs]

* please someone tell me I'm going to get away with that.*

No more lawyers please. ???

You have £30,000,000.

I have £86.20 in my bank account.

[djs]

Guys? Girls?

Help out, please

[giles]

Of course I can help you djs. My fee will be a mere £86.20

[djs]

Jan 14, 2014 0:01:11 GMT giles said:

Of course I can help you djs. My fee will be a mere £86.20

OK

It's gone very quiet on the comments board.

Most of them are 100% behind ecigs; just a shame that some smart Alec decided to point out the some daft celebrity might be using a named product to inhale an illegal one.

I think this article has run it's course. However, now I'm signed up to the Daily Mail to comment (free, by the way) , I'll look forward to the next round.