Channel 4 News on WHO report on "e-cigs"

[VapingBad]

The WHO's motivation is not money, they are at war with big tobacco and care more about destroying them than helping us.

[toots]

Aug 28, 2014 9:37:01 GMT VapingBad said:

The WHO's motivation is not money, they are at war with big tobacco and care more about destroying them than helping us.

That may be true but I'm sure I read somewhere that some in the WHO have financial interests in Big Pharma, now if that is true then the WHO are fighting not only BT but also fighting back for BP

[andy01424]

Was discussed bit on The Wright Prog today , WHO had admitted it was better than smoking BUT the main Concern for all this,is the future what it may bring as put,as with stinkies the links didnt come into affect for many yrs,and all that the main Concern was it COULD turn out to be a ticking timebomb like stinkies,it was also mentioned the contradicting evidence already put forward of the benefits as well as 2nd hand vapour having little to NO effect,so on this basis WHO is basing it what could be or Maybe ,not what May Not.As we all know few are in pockets of certain indviduals cough cough.....

What i did like was the only 1 call they squeezed in was from a Nikki from Manchester [maybe on here lol ] argument on Nicotine, right at the end shoved in theres also nicotine in vegatables...show ended......

Also they did a poll 62% were not bothered on 2nd hand vapour! you can see it here on 5od its last 5 mins of show
www.channel5.com/shows/the-wright-stuff

your gonna have to wait till tomoz to see it i am afraid they only add OD for show shown the day after


From Prog list :
E-CIGS: SECOND-HAND SMOKE TIMEBOMB?
And finally: do any of you worry that so-called e-cigs might be a second-hand smoke timebomb? It took years before anyone realised the danger of inhaling secondhand tobacco smoke, now the World Health Organisation claims secondhand vapes may pose a problem too, though more research is needed. So until we know the risks, should you carry on vaping in public or do it out of harms way?

[toots]

Aug 28, 2014 11:08:13 GMT andy01424 said:

And finally: do any of you worry that so-called e-cigs might be a second-hand smoke timebomb? It took years before anyone realised the danger of inhaling secondhand tobacco smoke, now the World Health Organisation claims secondhand vapes may pose a problem too, though more research is needed. So until we know the risks, should you carry on vaping in public or do it out of harms way?

Dr Konstantinos Farsalinos researched second-hand vapour and his results showed there was no risk to bystanders. There's more risk from pollution in town city's than there is standing next to someone vaping apparently.

[andy01424]

IF by what WHO is saying,all there basing everything on is a "Timebomb Maybe Scenario",even with all reports[yes saw that one and others] you can always see the oh But oh but that, Stinkies Timebomb took till late 50s to find out,since then medical and testing,have been improved greatly, plus ecigs have been around for a relative short time but from what has already been proven,we all know there is a risk with anything we do ,from walking to what drugs are prescribed,what we eat what we drink...the stink of Pharma is coming more and more of having there hand s behind all this

[markm]

They are using the second hand vapour argument because it was accepted with burnt tobacco,
But is STILL only theoretical with that!
If they can getaway with it once...............