markm
VENDOR
Joined:March 2013
Posts: 1,942
Location:
Likes: 1,762
Recent Posts
Last Online Feb 10, 2020 19:35:33 GMT
|
Post by markm on Mar 18, 2015 20:05:34 GMT
|
|
lairey
VENDOR Employee/Associate
Queen of Creams
Joined:November 2013
Posts: 6,731
Location:
Likes: 6,773
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 16, 2018 21:12:38 GMT
|
Post by lairey on Mar 18, 2015 20:45:48 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Joined:January 1970
Posts: 0
Location:
Recent Posts
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:29:10 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2015 21:17:37 GMT
This is the bit that matters from the conclusions
Future research will better define and further reduce residual risks from EC use to as low as possible by establishing appropriate quality control and standards. Although large longitudinal studies are warranted to elucidate whether ECs are a less harmful alternative to tobacco cigarettes and whether significant health benefits can be expected in smokers who switch from tobacco to ECs, the emerging evidence that EC use can reverse harm from tobacco smoking should be taken into consideration by regulatory authorities seeking to adopt proportional measures for the e-vapor category
There is too much evidence that vaping is less harmful that it is becoming difficult to deny it - although they do. However the the new mantra is "what are the long term effects?" and regulate in the mean time.
The author has worked with every Pharma company out there. This is a manifesto to regulate
nick
|
|
markm
VENDOR
Joined:March 2013
Posts: 1,942
Location:
Likes: 1,762
Recent Posts
Last Online Feb 10, 2020 19:35:33 GMT
|
Post by markm on Mar 18, 2015 21:31:54 GMT
He is in favour of THR, not an industry shill. He is talking about "proportional" regs. Which is exactly what we do need to protect from the WHO and their FCTC interference.
|
|