IFLS article on e-cig vapor misleading..

[xantivenxm]

Got really annoyed when I saw this..

I really like IFLS and their very interesting and little known facts.

But this article feels like it has stepped away from facts and gone to a biased opinion!
The title has nothing to do with the story. The article goes on to say "vape MAY damage lungs" but the title says definitively that it does.

www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/even-nicotine-free-e-cig-vapor-damages-lung-cells

[csmith10]

IFLS has posted several articles against vaping so I'm hardly surprised by this.

[Ripshod]

What's even worse is that if you look at the source of the information this article is based on, not one of the contributors, although linked to Universities, has a medical qualification.

Infact the writer, Janet Fang, is a freelance science journalist with no scientific qualifications, and probably no understanding of science. If she did she wouldn't repeat tripe like this.

It's such a shame ar*ses like this get exposure - should be exposed.

#JanetFangSux

[xantivenxm]

Yeah I'm really disappointed. The article I usually see from ifls are really good and based on fact. This was crap.