VaperFlask Squonker clone with Temp Ctrl 3FVape £54

[robby]

Jun 3, 2015 13:26:51 GMT blakey said:

I have an original vaporflask squonk 2.1s here and it's an absolute joy to hold and use, I'm seriously considering another.

I have a couple of clone flasks here too, both from 3F- one works but the other doesn't power up. Never been abused and never taken out of the house, just stopped working.
But for £52 I'm really tempted to try one of these

I would wait for Foclecig personally, I reckon they will be cheaper if she can get them blakey

[blakey]

Jun 3, 2015 13:46:18 GMT robby said:

Jun 3, 2015 13:26:51 GMT blakey said:

I have an original vaporflask squonk 2.1s here and it's an absolute joy to hold and use, I'm seriously considering another.

I have a couple of clone flasks here too, both from 3F- one works but the other doesn't power up. Never been abused and never taken out of the house, just stopped working.
But for £52 I'm really tempted to try one of these

I would wait for Foclecig personally, I reckon they will be cheaper if she can get them blakey

I'm still waiting for the owl squonkers from focal, not overly confident in waiting for focal to get them

Trouble is, an original is 5 times the price of one of these clones

[Deleted]

I really like the look of these. Curvy, tactile and looks lovely. Holding off til pay day or Xmas

[jeffc]

@spikeyfridge Ha,Ha, it won`t be Xmas, you will get one a.s.a p.

Colour will clash with your `yellow` croc`s.

[geordie_vaper]

the squonk bottle should be on the other side, so when you hold the mod your finger goes over the bottle, instead of moving the mod or using your thumb, seems like it would be a bit hmmmm unsteady wile your giving your bottle a good ol squonk but i do have small girly hands

also changing the layout would effect the 510 placement so dunno, am sure they could of stuck the bottle and 510 in the middle, got rid of the usb port and cut the hole for the bottle there then put a battery on each side of the bottle.

[Deleted]

Jun 3, 2015 20:47:28 GMT geordie_vaper said:

the squonk bottle should be on the other side, so when you hold the mod your finger goes over the bottle, instead of moving the mod or using your thumb, seems like it would be a bit hmmmm unsteady wile your giving your bottle a good ol squonk but i do have small girly hands

also changing the layout would effect the 510 placement so dunno, am sure they could of stuck the bottle and 510 in the middle, got rid of the usb port and cut the hole for the bottle there then put a battery on each side of the bottle.

I agree with what your saying on the layout m8, i bet it's come down to producing it as cheaply as possible utilizing a load of those flasks that have probably been made already and basically giving them a second life as a cheapish squonker.

[letsavit]

Looks like a much better squonker than that owl thing I own, even the dog don't want that as a chew....

[VapingBad]

Jun 3, 2015 22:21:12 GMT letsavit said:

Looks like a much better squonker than that owl thing I own, even the dog don't want that as a chew....

It's just a mech, so looks and ergonomics aside I imagine it's the atty it comes with that is the problem.

[letsavit]

Jun 4, 2015 0:21:59 GMT VapingBad said:

Jun 3, 2015 22:21:12 GMT letsavit said:

Looks like a much better squonker than that owl thing I own, even the dog don't want that as a chew....

It's just a mech, so looks and ergonomics aside I imagine it's the atty it comes with that is the problem.

It's a mech with a fire button that makes my thumb ache to get it to fire, the 510 is fixed with a massive drip tip, it's cheap plastic with a poop logo, the voltage drop is massive, the wire gauge is for 2 ohm plus coils unless you wanna melt it, the windows on the atty are useless due to condensation, if they was lower you could see the juice pool on the side, like a lancia dripper and Maggie the bulldog couldn't even be arsed to have a chew on it, other than that it's alright I suppose and don't want too say much in case anyone get offended.....

It's cheap but sometimes things get too cheap IMHO. The cherry bomber and atty robby and droog has posted today looks worth the extra....

[VapingBad]

Thanks letsavit my owl is still on the way, I think I will soak the envelope in bisto and give it to the dog now. Cheery bomber looks a more solid mech, but fugly, not as fugly as the owl though.

[letsavit]

Jun 4, 2015 1:07:52 GMT VapingBad said:

Thanks letsavit my owl is still on the way, I think I will soak the envelope in bisto and give it to the dog now. Cheery bomber looks a more solid mech, but fugly, not as fugly as the owl though.

Oh didn't know you had one on order...... Eeeerrrr it comes with a coiling tool, that's handy...and popping the bubble wrap, that's quite relaxing

[sydsut]

Jun 4, 2015 1:23:39 GMT letsavit said:

Jun 4, 2015 1:07:52 GMT VapingBad said:

Thanks letsavit my owl is still on the way, I think I will soak the envelope in bisto and give it to the dog now. Cheery bomber looks a more solid mech, but fugly, not as fugly as the owl though.

Oh didn't know you had one on order...... Eeeerrrr it comes with a coiling tool, that's handy...and popping the bubble wrap, that's quite relaxing

I find the Smokeless/Terminator Owl combo fine but it really needs to be held so that your forefinger is over the fire button , no use trying with your thumb, as it is uncomfortable that way letsavit . After I take a toot I always blow over the mouthpiece and this removes the condensation effectively.

[Deleted]

Be aware anyone planning buying this, usual Chinese method of misleading a bit on the "New In" it appears not to be in, nor for at least 15-20 business days, I am ok with the wait but gave them a piece of my mind for this kind of practise, the same will quite possibly apply to the Reo Squonker !

[VapingBad]

Thanks for letting us know car147

[Deleted]

No probs m8, not a big deal for me as I am still waiting on a couple of attys from FT, but I wish Chinese vendors would drop this practise.