Recent Posts

I'm not at a point where I can do the ss mesh wick thing. I am at the point of throwing all my re-buildables out( obviously I wont cos they satisfy me when I get it going) .... mainly because of the inconsistency of the science. They do not work 100% of the time and they do not work 50% of the time even though I do exactly the same thing each time I try. I get a good and a bad result doing the same thing.

So I end up sticking a silicon in just so I can vape. And its good so whats the problem?? I've just spent a tenner on mesh. Waste of money!!

Has anyone found anything that doesn't conduct but gives a safe vape? There must be something.

Have a look. What ya thoughts?

www.molehillmountainartdriptips.com/

I'm in love with 3

Was just about to ask for a share of it then read the last line. Its a good-un if you wanna post it somewhere accessible.

I'm wondering now if I can actually con my way into the Sunderland echo. Its worth a try.

Just need to get her on board. Be open about what you are doing and explain that you have Acquired Shiney Sindrome and are excused on medical grounds.

Keep it polite and to the point. Dont rant- thats what here is for haha.

Sure I've seen this one aswell.

Thank you for your email setting out your thoughts on a proposal issued
by the European Commission to amend current European law concerning the
manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products.

Among the products to be affected by the proposed changes are electronic
inhalers, commonly known as personal vaporizers or e-cigarettes, which
vaporize a liquid solution containing nicotine into an aerosol mist
which is then inhaled to simulate the act of smoking tobacco. The
Commission proposes to limit the amount of nicotine in solutions sold
for use in electronic cigarettes to four milligrams of nicotine per
millilitre, unless the products have been classified as for medicinal
use. This would render the solution too weak to be a viable source of
nicotine for smokers or ex-smokers, or would require manufacturers to
apply for a costly licence to manufacture medicinal products.

You are not alone in contacting me on this issue - many constituents
feel similarly strongly. I have examined the arguments and I see the
potential e-cigarettes offer as harm-reduction devices to improve human
health. I understand that e-cigarettes offer concentrated nicotine to
addicts without the 4000 toxins and carcinogens found in tobacco smoke,
that use of e-cigarettes removes the risk posed to non-smokers (and
especially to children of smokers) by second hand smoke, that
e-cigarettes appeal to adult smokers seeking to quit but not generally
to children or those not yet addicted to nicotine, that traditional
nicotine replacement therapies proposed by the NHS and the
pharmaceutical industry have had very limited success in helping smokers
quit permanently, and that thousands of British e-cigarette users (and
millions across the EU and the world) are likely to return smoking if
the directive is amended as foreseen and nicotine concentrations are
limited to 4mg/ml. I have no doubt that this will lead to a large
percentage of such users dying of smoking-related diseases that they
might otherwise have avoided. Such arguments have led me to conclude
that the proposed changes to limit permitted concentrations of nicotine
solution sold in the EU are counter-productive and will do more harm
than good.


As a member of the Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public
Health and Food Safety I will put forward these arguments and work to
convince other MEPs of the foolishness of diluting nicotine solution to
the point of uselessness. I would also encourage you to raise
awareness among others in the vapourizing community. If you have not
already done so I would also encourage you to write to your MP and
request that they raise the matter in Westminster. If we bring to the
attention of the public, the political world and the media the strong
arguments in favour of e-cigarettes as a harm reduction device and the
number of lives which can be saved through their use, we have a very
strong chance of winning the argument.

I would be happy to receive your comments and suggestions as we move
through the legislative process. I have offices in the UK and in
Brussels and if there is anything else you would like to bring to my
attention, please do not hesitate to get in touch. I am here to work on
your behalf and would be delighted to hear from you.

Yours sincerely,

Martin Callanan

Conservative Member of the European Parliament for the North East

Leader, European Conservatives and Reformists Group