Recent Posts

Edited lol

They will take it to court. They will fight them on the beaches! lol

This made me cross, found it on twitter:

scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2013/06/12/licensing-e-cigarettes-opportunities-and-risks/?utm_source=twitter_cr_uk&utm_medium=cruksocialmedia&utm_campaign=owntwitter_tweet

That's how I see it too a1laserboy.

You can have all the equipment and even the seeds to grow a cannabis plant, but you can't actually grow it.

I think the regulations mostly concentrate on cig-a-likes as they are the majority, but the e-liquid would be medicinalised, which will of course increase the cost of the product, but we will still be able to get the stuff we need.

But until we get to read their proposals (in full) we won't know what they really want to do!

That is of course if you are able to get juice (as we know it now). 

There's 2 ways of looking at this, get nicotine juice, as a medicine, to go into your non-medical devices.

Can't medicinalise juice, therefore banning them, and having to get your juice from the black market/stock up.

If the only issue is what is in the juice, then option 1 would be more likely, or will they try and medicinalise batteries, steel tubes, threads, wicks, coils separately, as we all know that we will be able to get these items separately.  

BTW there is no TAX on medical products. But the cost of making them a medicine will boost the price up.

Ultimately this is good news for those that want to just use look-a-likes, but for those that use egos/mods then this 'could' be bad news. But we will have to await the MHRA's full proposal.

But we have 2 years to build up nic bases, and get replacement mods, atties etc. Or 2 years to fight the proposal, or both