I do agree Raffles - why should we demand (and I use the word advisedly) to use our PVs when there are regulations already in place to protect other customers and members of staff?
Protect them from what?
The company's regulations are not thought up over a coffee-break, but carefully considered
How can you or I know that. This is an assumption we would all like to be so, but it does not appear to be the case here.
to ensure that the majority of customers who visit their stores can do so in comfort and safety.
What is preventing them from doing so?
If you fee that, once inside a Morrison's store, you are unable to resist the temptation that most of us feel when not able to vape,
This is not the point Of course I can do without a vape after I shop and I don't while I am, but if on occassion I would like to relax afterwords over a cup of coffee and I am behaving within the law of the land, then why shouln't I?
then I would respectfully suggest that you shop elsewhere, although for the time being I regrettably think that you will encounter the same regulation in all major supermarkets.
You've answered you're own popint here
I will reiterate - we do NOT have a right to vape wherever and whenever we want
Didi you not see mee make this very point in the letter to Morrisons, but with the counterpoint that no one has any rights in this country which means no one has the right to tell me not to (vape in this case)
- once inside a store you are effectively on someone else's property,
Moot point again... whose property The CEO The board of directors, The shareholders, The Public... and since it is deemed to be a public enclosed space for the purposes of the anti smoking law and vaping is not included in that act then... well let's go round again...
and subject to their regulations, not yours. This is supported by law, not notion.
If they wish to attract a good customer base they should consult and inform before introducing unsustainable regulation.
If you don't want me to burn a joss stick in your bedroom, and have a written regulation to that effect, then I have no right to expect to do so without your vigorous protest.
You're talking about private property, not a publically owned company
End of. This is typical usage of the control freak who wants the argument to end because he believes he is right and won't discuss further because he is. That really is the end of.....
Andy