|
Post by Frogster (The Alchemist) on Apr 9, 2013 19:34:52 GMT
I found this on my travels of the net It is a 630 page combination of clinical trials etc that has been published, I think the site is German, but the report is all English... Not read it all yet, but what I have read is very interesting. www.e-rauchen-wahrheiten.de/doku/studiensammlung.pdfSome Serious Reading here!!!!
|
|
MarkS
Super Member
Lord of Bargainous
Joined:February 2013
Posts: 2,103
Location:
Likes: 1,537
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 7, 2023 13:30:08 GMT
|
Post by MarkS on Apr 9, 2013 19:46:40 GMT
A very good resource Frogster, just saw it posted up on twitter....looks like I have some long nights a head of me.
|
|
Magsvape
Senior Member
Joined:July 2012
Posts: 459
Location:
Likes: 204
Recent Posts
Last Online Jan 21, 2021 14:31:11 GMT
|
Post by Magsvape on Apr 9, 2013 19:53:16 GMT
Skipped to the conclusion on the last page. Conclusion
Prevention of tobacco use is historically difficult in spite of clear health hazards. Regulatory responses to the problem are tenuous and subject to reversal or delay as political and economic fortunes change. A lasting reduction in tobacco related illness might result from unleashing clean alternative nicotine delivery systems to compete directly with tobacco products. Even if used very broadly, clean inhaled nicotine might reduce public health problems as much as a very successful tobacco control programme. Additional research should attempt to quantify the health consequences of using pure nicotine. Meanwhile, clinical and marketing trials of clean nicotine inhalers are defensible in populations with a high burden of smoking related illness.
|
|
sleepyduck
Super Member
Joined:January 2013
Posts: 1,594
Location:
Likes: 996
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 26, 2016 12:40:32 GMT
|
Post by sleepyduck on Apr 9, 2013 19:59:05 GMT
Skipped to the conclusion on the last page. Conclusion
Prevention of tobacco use is historically difficult in spite of clear health hazards. Regulatory responses to the problem are tenuous and subject to reversal or delay as political and economic fortunes change. A lasting reduction in tobacco related illness might result from unleashing clean alternative nicotine delivery systems to compete directly with tobacco products. Even if used very broadly, clean inhaled nicotine might reduce public health problems as much as a very successful tobacco control programme. Additional research should attempt to quantify the health consequences of using pure nicotine. Meanwhile, clinical and marketing trials of clean nicotine inhalers are defensible in populations with a high burden of smoking related illness. It took them 630 pages to come to that conclusion
|
|
chrisde
Full Member
Joined:December 2012
Posts: 194
Location:
Likes: 96
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 25, 2018 9:17:30 GMT
|
Post by chrisde on Apr 10, 2013 7:56:12 GMT
This is a collection that has been done by German volunteers for the politicians and "experts" involved - it has been printed out and sent to them. Here is the original announcement: www.e-rauchen-forum.de/thread-64193.htmlIt is not one study, but a collection of all the studies that WE all know about but THEY claim to not exist. They now have it in BIG binders - so they can not claim ignorance any more. Here's the list of people who got a copy: - Frau Linda McAvan MdEP - Frau Dr. med. Martina Pötschke-Langer - Herr Dr. Konstantions Farsalinos - Karl - Heinz Florenz MdEP - Herr Matthias Groote MdEP - Herr Dr. Peter Liese MdEP MdEP = MEP
|
|
MarkS
Super Member
Lord of Bargainous
Joined:February 2013
Posts: 2,103
Location:
Likes: 1,537
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 7, 2023 13:30:08 GMT
|
Post by MarkS on Apr 10, 2013 11:21:36 GMT
A great PDF to forward to all of your MEP's.
Get on it!
|
|