womble
Super Member
Joined:August 2011
Posts: 3,221
Location:
Likes: 712
Recent Posts
Last Online Jul 8, 2016 23:24:58 GMT
|
Post by womble on Apr 25, 2013 7:16:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Sandra (aka Chillax) on Apr 25, 2013 7:20:50 GMT
Did you see the EU talking about this yesterday? Some seem to be getting a slightly better attitude
|
|
womble
Super Member
Joined:August 2011
Posts: 3,221
Location:
Likes: 712
Recent Posts
Last Online Jul 8, 2016 23:24:58 GMT
|
Post by womble on Apr 25, 2013 8:24:41 GMT
No, is it available anywhere to watch it, do you know?
|
|
ChillerVapes
Super Member
Aka Chillerhippie
Joined:October 2012
Posts: 1,675
Location:
Likes: 470
Recent Posts
Last Online May 8, 2015 18:55:40 GMT
|
Post by ChillerVapes on Apr 25, 2013 8:59:03 GMT
Oh crap... it's N.I.C.E who are doing the research on NCPs vs tobacco... I wonder what bs they will recommend on the outcome. My guess would be something on the lines of 'our results show that NCPs have a far lower risk to health than regular tobacco products, but we believe that in the intest of public safety, that NCPs with a nicotine content more than 0.4% must be classed as a medical device. Yadda yadda yadda, flavours limited to tobacco or flavourless to prevent them from becomming popular with minors.'
|
|
collie2011
Super Member
Joined:May 2011
Posts: 2,230
Location:
Likes: 750
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 16, 2016 17:50:48 GMT
|
Post by collie2011 on Apr 25, 2013 8:59:49 GMT
So is this good news? To me it reads that they still want to look at regulation, this might just buy us a bit of time while they set up a new law to cover it?
|
|
collie2011
Super Member
Joined:May 2011
Posts: 2,230
Location:
Likes: 750
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 16, 2016 17:50:48 GMT
|
Post by collie2011 on Apr 25, 2013 9:01:01 GMT
Oh crap... it's N.I.C.E who are doing the research on NCPs vs tobacco... I wonder what bs they will recommend on the outcome. My guess would be something on the lines of 'our results show that NCPs have a far lower risk to health than regular tobacco products, but we believe that in the intest of public safety, that NCPs with a nicotine content more than 0.4% must be classed as a medical device. Yadda yadda yadda, flavours limited to tobacco or flavourless to prevent them from becomming popular with minors.' Flavourless isn't a problem, you can buy flavourings anywhere. They are food flavourings
|
|
matt1988
Super Member
Joined:March 2013
Posts: 826
Location:
Likes: 256
Recent Posts
Last Online Feb 13, 2023 3:39:21 GMT
|
Post by matt1988 on Apr 25, 2013 10:20:52 GMT
Yeh just get flavourless a little stronger than normal, and just get flavourings from somewhere
|
|
djs
Super Member
Puffing on the RY4 today.
Joined:October 2012
Posts: 9,413
Location:
Likes: 5,874
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 29, 2019 6:13:03 GMT
|
Post by djs on Apr 25, 2013 11:38:51 GMT
I think "outside the scope of this draft directive" sounds encouraging. As far as I'm concerned E-Lites have it right. 1) Tobacco products 2) NRT 3) Consumer e-cig products. 3 very clear and easily distinguishable boundaries. Now - where's my bubblegum liquid, as I need it to get the kids hooked, preferably before it all gets banned. Are the tobacco companies really "increasingly" buying up e-cig companies? Have Joyetech sold out to Golden Virginia? Can I sell my homemade e-liquid laboratory (the kitchen) to Mayfair fags for like a million quid? Can someone buy E-lites please? Just give them £1-2 billion and re-do the website in a more "helpful" way. Let the boys sun themselves on an island in Barbados and enjoy their retirement.
|
|
giles
Super Member
Rogue Element
Joined:August 2012
Posts: 2,208
Location:
Likes: 709
Recent Posts
Last Online Feb 23, 2013 12:10:56 GMT
|
Post by giles on Apr 25, 2013 12:05:11 GMT
So is this good news? To me it reads that they still want to look at regulation, this might just buy us a bit of time while they set up a new law to cover it? I think it is good news, as far as it goes. Anything which delays legislation means more time to collect evidence, and more ecig users, and so less likely that the legislation will be destructive. I think we have to expect some regulation, if only to stop sales to minors. Flavourless isn't a problem, you can buy flavourings anywhere. They are food flavourings Trouble is that if the EU have their way, tobacco-flavoured cartridges will be the only way to buy nic, because nothing else will have been through the approved medical research. And that is supposing someone does the research - no one has yet.
|
|
matt1988
Super Member
Joined:March 2013
Posts: 826
Location:
Likes: 256
Recent Posts
Last Online Feb 13, 2023 3:39:21 GMT
|
Post by matt1988 on Apr 25, 2013 12:24:09 GMT
Isn't there 1 company going through the research now?
And I agree, the only way to buy e-cigs would be in a pre-filled carto, attatched to an auto 510 battery.
|
|
djs
Super Member
Puffing on the RY4 today.
Joined:October 2012
Posts: 9,413
Location:
Likes: 5,874
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 29, 2019 6:13:03 GMT
|
Post by djs on Apr 25, 2013 13:00:10 GMT
And I agree, the only way to buy e-cigs would be in a pre-filled carto, attatched to an auto 510 battery. I can't see them banning ego batteries, but my concern is the look-a-like companies being the "end game" players, charging £3.99 per refill. At that point, I would bow out totally. However, if a company with some morals stepped up to the plate with a decent £2-3 cartomiser and didn't actually LIE about the "value" of that cartomiser in terms of nicotine yield or "puffs" there might be hope. If you could freely buy batteries and get 10 pre-filled cartos for £15-25 from, say, Boots or Sainsbury's, that would have some use./.? Trouble is, the current company with the money (who are also effectively/*possibly* helping us whilst trying to save their own backsides) thinks a carto is worth £3.99 and offers 40 fags. Both of which are simply not true. What if, in endlessly refusing to back down on the "40" cigarettes claim, the government then wants to tax one carto as 40 cigarettes> ? ! Worse than bad, catastrophic.
|
|