MHRA, review.

[vereybowring]

So I was looking for a new set of regulations to cover a product that hasn't been invented yet so I got a sample from the MHRA in the UK.

Have to say I was not impressed with delivery times. Takes many years to apparently get anything done as they have meetings and sip tea ? They do a public consultation thing but don't actually listen to members of the public, only interested parties that may have a stake in the outcome (why is it called public then ?).


I have concerns about the quality of the product. It seems everybody they used to decide how best to enact regulation has direct connections to industries who have a stake in the general product are they are supposed to be looking at. Also they use evidence given to them by people they assured consumers they would never have dealings with again. I'm confused, does this mean they can't be trusted an inch ?

Efficacy. Too early to figure this out despite the years of wrangling they claim to have been doing (for instance they seem to be looking at stuff that is years out of date). From my perspective the result of their work will be a big court case which will have anything they say reversed.

P.S. Blimey, I definitely going to paypal for a refund - it seems that they aren't even fully responsible for the legislation they talk with such authority about. I just found out there's this EU thing that has overall mandate for this sort of thing. Paypal better get me my money back on this pile of **** !

[Perpetua]

Moved you to here instead Verey.

[vereybowring]

Well I knew you would move it eventually, lol.

Could not resist reviewing the performance of the leading medical licensing advisory panel in the UK.