4madcats
VENDOR
Sic 'em Kitty
Joined:October 2012
Posts: 1,072
Location:
Likes: 525
Recent Posts
Last Online Jun 17, 2014 10:57:49 GMT
|
Post by 4madcats on Sept 3, 2013 15:48:09 GMT
MHRA confirms e-cigarettes are not medicinal products – but they still face a ban! Totally Wicked has obtained written confirmation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) that none of its current product range is a medicine or a medicinal device, and that it does not need to obtain medicines marketing authorisations for its products. Notwithstanding that, the MHRA has stated that if MEPs vote for the EU's draft Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) in its current form on the 10th of September, it will require Totally Wicked from 2016 to market the same products as medicines and obtain such authorisations. In other words, it would have to seek medicines licences for products the MHRA has confirmed are not medicines. This is the clearest statement yet that currently available e-cigarette products will be banned from 2016 if the TPD passes into law. Asking for clarity on the intentions of the MHRA, as stated by them on the 12th of June 2013 to regulate ‘nicotine containing products’ in line with the proposed EU TPD, Totally Wicked’s lawyers this week received a reply to a litigation letter of claim. Confident of the fact that its products are not medicinal, Totally Wicked has been proven right and the MHRA has confirmed that currently, under the Human Medicine Regulation 2012, and the Medicinal Products Directive 2001/83/EC, none of the products sold by Totally Wicked as of the 22nd of August 2013 are considered medicinal, nor are they considered medical devices under the Medical Devices Directive 1993 (Directive 93/42/EEC). As a result of this confirmation, Totally Wicked is not required to seek marketing authorisations or any other form of license for its products. However, in their reply, the MHRA stated that if the draft TPD passes into law in its current form, Totally Wicked, in order to legally sell its current product range, would be required to seek marketing authorisation from the MHRA under the Medicinal Products Directive. Having established that none of Totally Wicked’s product range qualifies as a medicinal product, it would be impossible for Totally Wicked to obtain authorisations and as a result it would be prohibited in law from selling any of its existing products. As Totally Wicked’s product range is broadly similar to that distributed by other electronic cigarette vendors in the UK, the logical conclusion to draw from the above is that if the draft TPD passes as proposed, there will be a shutdown of the general sale of currently available electronic cigarette products from 2016 throughout the UK. Perversely, the MHRA also confirmed in its reply, that it accepted that conventional tobacco cigarettes are “capable” of being regulated as medicinal products, but that it does not intend to include these nicotine containing products within the proposed new regime. Accordingly, conventional tobacco cigarettes, which are responsible for the deaths of 700,000 people across the EU each year, will not be subject to the same de facto marketing ban faced by electronic cigarettes Should the TPD be passed as proposed, Totally Wicked will mount a legal challenge, domestically and at EU level as a result of the perversity of being forced to make a medicinal claim for a confirmed non-medicinal product, while tobacco companies continue to sell their own nicotine containing products unimpeded by the medicinal regulatory regime. Fraser Cropper, Chief Executive of Totally Wicked said, “Since the commencement of the MHRA’s consultation in 2010 our company and our customers have made it very clear that our products were not and could not be legally or ethically classed as medicinal products. Electronic cigarettes are transforming smokers’ habits by the thousands each week. That our government and its regulators are knowingly attempting to destroy this product’s utility, whilst continuing to endorse the on-going endemic of tobacco availability, is one of the most incredible and concerning matters of our time.” MEPs will vote on these proposals on the 10th of September 2013.
|
|
ChillerVapes
Super Member
Aka Chillerhippie
Joined:October 2012
Posts: 1,675
Location:
Likes: 470
Recent Posts
Last Online May 8, 2015 18:55:40 GMT
|
Post by ChillerVapes on Sept 3, 2013 16:14:04 GMT
HOLY SHEITE!
I knew that the government were corrupt but that is just friggin plain and simple 'we would rather you died of cancer than enjoy life so long as it means you will be lining our pockets'
The MHRA should be wiped out of existence for this... only god knows what other nasty little secrets they have!
|
|
apostle51
Senior Member
Joined:November 2012
Posts: 322
Location:
Likes: 67
Recent Posts
Last Online May 1, 2023 10:06:40 GMT
|
Post by apostle51 on Sept 3, 2013 17:00:23 GMT
I dont get this. Its obvious that as of now, no ecig or liquid would be classed as a medicine because as of now there is no law deeming them so. The fact is mhra want them to be classed as medicinal so if they are successful it is at that point, when the law is introduced, they go from ecig to medicine.
Its like saying that as of now oranges are not a medicinal product..obvious, but if the mhra want to class them as a medicinal vitamin c supplement by 2016 then they then would be classed as a medicine. But for now, there just plain old oranges.
|
|
lobeydosser
Super Member
Joined:August 2012
Posts: 4,718
Location:
Likes: 3,634
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 2, 2021 14:59:09 GMT
|
Post by lobeydosser on Sept 3, 2013 17:22:22 GMT
So the law at present says that e-cigs and e-juice is not illegal. So a law is about to be passed that will make them illegal.
So what's new. This happens all the time.
|
|
lal
Super Member
Joined:June 2013
Posts: 623
Location:
Likes: 499
Recent Posts
Last Online Jun 3, 2024 5:25:37 GMT
|
Post by lal on Sept 3, 2013 17:24:26 GMT
I think what Mhra are saying is that at the moment e liquids containing nicotine are not medicinal products, but that if eu directive is passed as it is, they would then require a licence and would be regulated in the same way as nrt?
|
|