dnglos
Senior Member
Joined:December 2012
Posts: 365
Location:
Likes: 415
Recent Posts
Last Online Dec 18, 2020 21:00:44 GMT
|
Post by dnglos on Oct 10, 2013 16:44:42 GMT
Where does the 4mg come into this? I was under the impression that any products which purport to aid smoking cessation would have to be licensed and that their nic content would be limited to 2mg per device and 4mg/ml (although the council is looking to reduce that to 1mg & 2mg/ml) - everything else will be limited to 30mg/ml. Is that not right?
|
|
barrynorton
Super Member
Joined:September 2013
Posts: 987
Location:
Likes: 372
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 18, 2015 7:55:26 GMT
|
Post by barrynorton on Oct 10, 2013 18:26:35 GMT
Sorry, I am being dumb, right?
That's what Article 18 reverts to, in the absence of Amendment 71, if the exclusion in Amendment 170 doesn't apply?
|
|
inigomontoya
Full Member
Joined:May 2013
Posts: 202
Location:
Likes: 46
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 6, 2018 17:36:45 GMT
|
Post by inigomontoya on Oct 10, 2013 18:53:13 GMT
Because proposed nicotine content is at about 4mg/ml - which won't do anything for anyone who actually needs to quit! Sorry, I must be getting confused. Proposed by whom? The amended EU directive places no constraint on medically-authorised devices (though the poisons legislation puts a cap of 7.5% on it). British American Tobacco's Vype product has the following characteristics: They could, and very well might, seek medical authorisation for this. Where does the 4mg come into this? (I must have just lost the thread) The MHRA proposals for medical e-cigs were 4mg/ml. So I'm assuming that they haven't changed their tune, correct me if I'm wrong. AFAIK nothing on the market would pass their requirements. Sorry, I am being dumb, right? That's what Article 18 reverts to, in the absence of Amendment 71, if the exclusion in Amendment 170 doesn't apply? Insofar as I understand it.
|
|
Karma
Part Time Staff
Lorraine
No Longer a Vapefest Virgin
Joined:January 2012
Posts: 21,980
Location:
Likes: 7,589
Recent Posts
Last Online May 27, 2016 17:25:37 GMT
|
Post by Karma on Oct 10, 2013 18:57:18 GMT
Sorry, I must be getting confused. Proposed by whom? The amended EU directive places no constraint on medically-authorised devices (though the poisons legislation puts a cap of 7.5% on it). British American Tobacco's Vype product has the following characteristics: They could, and very well might, seek medical authorisation for this. Where does the 4mg come into this? (I must have just lost the thread) The MHRA proposals for medical e-cigs were 4mg/ml. So I'm assuming that they haven't changed their tune, correct me if I'm wrong. AFAIK nothing on the market would pass their requirements. I thought the 4mg limit was the proposal for e-liquid that was not classed as medicinal, i.e. only the medical expensive cig-a-likes would be above 4mg, the lovely liquid we like would only be available at strengths up to 4mg ??? I could be wrong though, I often am and this whole thing is just so confusing
|
|
barrynorton
Super Member
Joined:September 2013
Posts: 987
Location:
Likes: 372
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 18, 2015 7:55:26 GMT
|
Post by barrynorton on Oct 10, 2013 19:07:22 GMT
Yeah, I'm confused too.
(I hope my questions don't come off as sarcastic - they're not meant to be, they're honest - but I know I sometimes come off that way)
|
|
dnglos
Senior Member
Joined:December 2012
Posts: 365
Location:
Likes: 415
Recent Posts
Last Online Dec 18, 2020 21:00:44 GMT
|
Post by dnglos on Oct 10, 2013 19:56:32 GMT
Yeah, I'm confused too. (I hope my questions don't come off as sarcastic - they're not meant to be, they're honest - but I know I sometimes come off that way) They don't sound sarcastic at all - I'm confused too. Looking at Amendment 170 I can't figure out what the limit is for licensed products, although sections 1a, 1b & 1c appear to have been left intact.
|
|
inigomontoya
Full Member
Joined:May 2013
Posts: 202
Location:
Likes: 46
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 6, 2018 17:36:45 GMT
|
Post by inigomontoya on Oct 10, 2013 20:51:52 GMT
The MHRA proposals for medical e-cigs were 4mg/ml. So I'm assuming that they haven't changed their tune, correct me if I'm wrong. AFAIK nothing on the market would pass their requirements. I thought the 4mg limit was the proposal for e-liquid that was not classed as medicinal, i.e. only the medical expensive cig-a-likes would be above 4mg, the lovely liquid we like would only be available at strengths up to 4mg ??? I could be wrong though, I often am and this whole thing is just so confusing I was quoting the pre-71/170 MHRA limits, which would see all e-cigs medicinal and nicotine mg levels in line with nicorette (4ml). I am also confused as to what they'd limit things to now - but I presume they won't want to shift much. Sorry for sticking my nose in, I'll leave you all to ruminate
|
|