jaki
Full Member
Joined:December 2010
Posts: 245
Location:
Likes: 1
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 24, 2023 3:56:58 GMT
|
Post by jaki on Jun 17, 2010 22:47:37 GMT
I think we can go off to bed now Chrissie. Wow .. sorry that looks a bit naughty!  Only a bit! |
|
|
|
Post by omegaman on Jun 17, 2010 22:48:33 GMT
You coming too jaki!  |
|
jaki
Full Member
Joined:December 2010
Posts: 245
Location:
Likes: 1
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 24, 2023 3:56:58 GMT
|
Post by jaki on Jun 17, 2010 22:49:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by omegaman on Jun 17, 2010 22:52:53 GMT
|
|
jaki
Full Member
Joined:December 2010
Posts: 245
Location:
Likes: 1
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 24, 2023 3:56:58 GMT
|
Post by jaki on Jun 17, 2010 22:54:47 GMT
LOL - behave yourself and go and read the news!
I'm off too - I'll be asleep by the time you've read that!
|
|
|
|
Post by omegaman on Jun 17, 2010 22:55:09 GMT
If you look elsewhere, the post is on another forum and in the news section of vapersnetwork.org/. I know Kate always updates us here, so I won't steal her thunder. I was searching as you posted!  Thanks jaki. |
|
|
|
Post by omegaman on Jun 17, 2010 22:57:41 GMT
LOL - behave yourself and go and read the news! I'm off too - I'll be asleep by the time you've read that! Goodnight jaki  and thanks for the info! Interesting read.  |
|
Jules
Super Member
Joined:October 2009
Posts: 527 
Location:
Likes: 186
Recent Posts
Last Online Dec 7, 2023 19:04:41 GMT
|
Post by Jules on Jun 18, 2010 15:43:42 GMT
I have copyied n pasted this from TW Forum The Regulatory Policy Committee has deemed the MHRA's impact assessment to have been substantially inadequate, disproportionate and flawed, so it's hard to see how it can possibly proceed. If they want to continue harrassing our industry, they'll have to start again from square 1, and do proper risk and impact assessments first (would take months, possibly years ) Quote The RPC is of the opinion that the IA and consultation letter do not provide sufficient evidence to suggest that there is a significant risk to public health from currently unlicensed NCPs which would justify the future regulation of these products. MHRA should have made clearer what evidence is available to suggest there are safety and public health concerns about these products and considered a wider range of policy options before consulting on the introduction of a mandatory licensing requirement for all NCPs. In addition, the data and assumptions used in the IA for estimating the costs and benefits of the new regulations do not appear to be robust. Full article here. regulatorypolicycommittee.independent.gov.uk/rpc/wp-content/uploads/20Jules P.S. Hope it's alright to post this here and that i did it right lol |
|
|
|
Post by Chrissie on Jun 19, 2010 12:00:19 GMT
Thanks Jules  & no problem about you posting it here I was going to start a separate thread with a link to the RPC's report but was waiting for Kate to come along as I didn't want to steal her thunder. However, I think it is such good news that the RPC have slapped the MHRA's wrists so hard I want as many people to read it as soon possible. |
|
hissie
Super Member
Joined:July 2010
Posts: 4,601
Location:
Likes: 120
Recent Posts
Last Online Apr 22, 2021 20:41:37 GMT
|
Post by hissie on Jul 8, 2010 23:45:36 GMT
Any more news on this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chrissie on Jul 9, 2010 12:18:51 GMT
I'll see if I can find any updates for you Hissie.
|
|
& no problem about you posting it here 
