Richard46
Super Member
Joined:September 2014
Posts: 756 
Location:
Likes: 865
Recent Posts
Last Online Jul 30, 2024 12:27:45 GMT
|
Post by Richard46 on Jun 2, 2017 16:12:38 GMT
Just watched this Vaping with Vic review made a few days ago and towards the end he says it will be the last review he can make that includes a recommendation because of the new regs.
at 16.00m
I must admit I cannot see anything in the TRPR that restricts reviews. Has anyone heard any other reviewers say similar? Any reviewers on here who are going to adopt the same limitations.
If there is such a restraint would it apply to us on here giving each other recommendations?
|
|
|
|
Post by Postmodern Smoking on Jun 2, 2017 17:17:13 GMT
I presume that a review risks being classed as an advertisement or promotion of the product. i.e. Part 7 of the TRPR 2016
However HERE states that |
|
striker42
Super Member
Perp's Wee Pocket Rocket
Head Haggis Hunter
Joined:March 2016
Posts: 4,240
Location:
Likes: 5,518
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 5, 2016 8:19:10 GMT
|
Post by striker42 on Jun 2, 2017 18:01:14 GMT
Just another area of the TPD that's as clear as muddy water.
|
|
VapingBad
Mod Maker
Mr Fix-it
Joined:January 2014
Posts: 13,798
Location:
Likes: 14,172
Recent Posts
Last Online Aug 19, 2023 21:23:33 GMT
|
Post by VapingBad on Jun 2, 2017 18:16:12 GMT
Only an issue if the reviewer "gains" by it IMO, tricky in that a free mod/atty/liquid to review could be argued as a gain, though obviously not worth you time compared to min wage if you do a reasonable review.
|
|
tim
Super Member
Joined:February 2015
Posts: 2,137
Location:
Likes: 1,516
Recent Posts
Last Online May 25, 2022 22:18:37 GMT
|
Post by tim on Jun 2, 2017 20:43:50 GMT
Whatever happened to free speech. It's not illegal to state that heroin feels good (well, if no feeling can be classed as good), so what law is broken if the reviewer isn't advertising the product. It just an opinion. Which should still be allowed. Damn these controlling buffoons!
|
|
