Richard46
Super Member
Joined:September 2014
Posts: 756
Location:
Likes: 865
Recent Posts
Last Online Jul 30, 2024 12:27:45 GMT
|
Post by Richard46 on Jun 4, 2018 20:16:43 GMT
|
|
Postmodern Smoking
Super Member
Personal Mix Solver
( Dave )
Joined:October 2012
Posts: 7,148
Location:
Likes: 9,833
Recent Posts
Last Online Nov 28, 2024 10:01:14 GMT
|
Post by Postmodern Smoking on Jun 4, 2018 21:30:13 GMT
Consultation period: 23 May 2018 - 3 September 2018 Questionnaire on link Richard provided (reportedly takes about 30 minutes to complete). .... I haven't yet had time to take a closer look.
|
|
shiny
Senior Member
Joined:March 2013
Posts: 358
Location:
Likes: 226
Recent Posts
Last Online Aug 19, 2022 22:07:05 GMT
|
Post by shiny on Jun 4, 2018 23:39:30 GMT
I had a read through the questions asked and came away with the feeling that the decline in Tobbaco products was causing a significant loss in taxes received and should current taxes on Tobbaco products be increased over a short period of time to gain maximum income before users switched to cheaper alternatives, over a longer period of time to avoid people changing but with the disadvantage of taking longer to rectify the shortfall in taxes or/and start applying taxes to “novel items” e-cigarettes water pipes etc. Also while we are at it should countries that have lower taxes be increased in line with those that are paying more at present.
It was only a matter of time for taxes to be applied to e-cigarettes whether it’s the EU or our own government with the unprecedented growth in the e-cigarette market.
|
|
Richard46
Super Member
Joined:September 2014
Posts: 756
Location:
Likes: 865
Recent Posts
Last Online Jul 30, 2024 12:27:45 GMT
|
Post by Richard46 on Jun 5, 2018 7:57:41 GMT
Lets no forget that E-cigs already attract the same consumer taxes as most other goods. The real question is is it inevitable that they are subject to some extra punative or sin tax. That may happen but I think it is far from inevitable and actually any UK government that wishes to apply such a tax faces considerable problems. 1 There is now a huge user base many of whom owe their health etc to vaping. 2 Other Nicotine Reduction products that contain nicotine (patches gums etc) are not punatively taxed they are taxed at a special low rate (5%). Difficult to justify extra tax for one NRT and a 10% benefit for another. 3 With mounting evidence that vaping has no serious; and possibly no long term health affects then the medical arguments for a tax to limit vaping disappear and indeed are contradicted by 4 Strong evidence (albeit it often circumstantial) that vaping has had a significant role in reducing smoking levels. With much of the above supported by government agencies esp the NHS and Public Health England any government that supported punative taxation on e-cigs would look either cynical or totally confused or perhaps both.
I could add 5 & 6 say 5; good PR by not following an unpopular EU policy and 6 being seen to encourage a UK industry and no doubt others can think of 7, 8, 9 etc.
|
|
|
Post by Perpetua on Jun 5, 2018 9:51:28 GMT
Thank you for the link Richard46 . . . . I'll have a proper read when I've a bit more time.
|
|
pacman
Super Member
Joined:February 2015
Posts: 1,983
Location:
Likes: 721
Recent Posts
Last Online Nov 28, 2024 7:07:25 GMT
|
Post by pacman on Jun 5, 2018 20:45:40 GMT
|
|