Recent Posts

Only some of the anti stuff is Tobacco Company related, in the main they seem more interested
In restrictive regulations. They would be quite content to own the market in cigalikes, and the
Least effective of those. They could claim the harm reduction cudos without impacting on cig sales.

The biggest cloak and dagger act is the pharmaceutical companies, ones that produce NRT. They
Have lobbyists and access to decision makers. They are loosing just as much, if not more financially
As the tobacco companies.

The third group is public health, in the form of tobacco control. They had already written a script for
The "end game" of smoking, in the first world. Ecigs don't fit that game plan. They have already consigned
Snuss, the first genuine harm reduction product for smokers, to the history books. It never even
Reached the shelves in most countries before they stamped it out.
They have been using many of the same arguments against ecigs. This is the group that constitute the biggest
Threat as they have the ears of politicians. These are the ones who have made an industry out of
Quitting and they are fighting to save that industry. The more scared they get, the madder the stories
They propagate, they are on the run.

Thanks, the more people see the article the better.

And this, again from the Spectator
blogs.spectator.co.uk/damian-thompson/2015/02/smoking-kills-nicotines-doesnt-a-huge-boost-for-the-campaign-to-promote-e-cigarettes/

www.spectator.co.uk/health/features-health/cover-feature/9442271/e-cigarettes-save-lives/
please share this with anyone you can.

and a vid to follow up the briefing.

Those were unconnected with butterscotch flavour, so not covered by her comment.