ausfost
Super Member
Joined:January 2013
Posts: 619
Location:
Likes: 635
Recent Posts
Last Online May 30, 2016 9:01:52 GMT
|
Post by ausfost on Jul 30, 2014 13:55:55 GMT
Blah Blah Blah, lots of "suspected" "could cause disease" and "formaldehyde" oh lets just go back on the cigs eh? ifl science clicky linky all you VV users better start vaping at 3.2V, I also didn't know that the nic hit is intensified when vaping at higher temperature. love to hear your opinions on their facts
|
|
thatguy
Super Member
From grace I fell in love with Her
Joined:June 2014
Posts: 1,475
Location:
Likes: 1,418
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 4, 2022 1:05:45 GMT
|
Post by thatguy on Jul 30, 2014 14:03:54 GMT
I think the sites name i f***ing love science confirms the validity of it's articles. A blog site disguised as being scientific.
|
|
Spiritdancer
Junior Member
Joined:June 2014
Posts: 88
Location:
Likes: 55
Recent Posts
Last Online Jul 17, 2019 17:51:53 GMT
|
Post by Spiritdancer on Jul 30, 2014 14:35:38 GMT
Well the fact is no-one knows what the long term effects of inhaling liquid vapour will be. That is what they should be worried about, not the effects of second hand vapour. I've noticed, though that in all these articles, the writers always assume we vapers are inhaling nicotine in fairly high doses. No mention of the thousands of us who atually vape zero nicotine liquid or very very low strength nicotine. As an example, I started off on medium strength (12-18mg) and only stayed on that for a few days before going down to 8mg and then 6mg. Apart from a few low strength bottles I have left, I'm now on zero nicotine. So unless it turns out that PG and VG, or something in the additives (flavourings, colourings) is harmful when inhaled, it still has to be way less harmful than smoking.
|
|
VapingBad
Mod Maker
Mr Fix-it
Joined:January 2014
Posts: 13,800
Location:
Likes: 14,176
Recent Posts
Last Online Oct 6, 2024 16:13:51 GMT
|
Post by VapingBad on Jul 30, 2014 14:42:53 GMT
That's just a sado that has read and regurgitated the recent rubbish on sciencenews.orgthat reported some of Glantz's waffle and misfiled it under science, no journalism at all just cut & paste bottom feeder.
|
|
clairea
MOVED ON
Mad Cat Woman
Joined:June 2014
Posts: 1,650
Location:
Likes: 813
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 22, 2015 18:55:21 GMT
|
Post by clairea on Jul 30, 2014 15:15:03 GMT
That's just a sado that has read and regurgitated the recent rubbish on sciencenews.orgthat reported some of Glantz's waffle and misfiled it under science, no journalism at all just cut & paste bottom feeder. agree he's just reporting on the same article, no other scientific proof other than one article the blogger has read,
|
|
clairea
MOVED ON
Mad Cat Woman
Joined:June 2014
Posts: 1,650
Location:
Likes: 813
Recent Posts
Last Online Mar 22, 2015 18:55:21 GMT
|
Post by clairea on Jul 30, 2014 17:29:18 GMT
but it's quite fun reading all the arguments
|
|
Montana
Super Member
Joined:May 2014
Posts: 811
Location:
Likes: 537
Recent Posts
Last Online Feb 28, 2022 10:13:11 GMT
|
Post by Montana on Jul 30, 2014 18:08:19 GMT
A little off topic, but all the things that Mr Glantz has said and written had always reminded me of something but I couldn't think what is was , but today I remembered.
This little section is dedicated to Mr Glantz , the part of Dean Yeager is all us vapers in one voice -
"Dr Ray Stantz: Hey, Dean Yeager! Are you moving us to a better office on campus? Dean Yeager: No, you're being moved off campus. The Board of Regents has decided to terminate your grant. You are to vacate these premises immediately.
Dr Ray Stantz: What?
Dr. Peter Venkman: This is preposterous. I demand an explanation.
Dean Yeager: This university will no longer continue any funding for any of your group's activities.
Dr. Peter Venkman: But the kids love us!
Dean Yeager: Doctor... Venkman. The purpose of science is to serve mankind. You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle. Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist, Dr. Venkman!
Dr. Peter Venkman: I see.
Dean Yeager: And you have no place in this department, or this university. "
I think it should be sent to him just to see what response he would give.
Andy
|
|