How an E-Cigarette could lead to cocaine..

[everythingliquid]

I'm absolutely lost for words...

www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/11074081/How-an-e-cigarette-could-lead-to-cocaine.html

Your thoughts people?

[VapingBad]

presstitute: A member of the media who will alter their story and reporting based on financial interests or other ties with usually partisan individuals or groups.

or

"Next level bullsh1t"

or

complete and utter bo11ocks

[Deleted]

I am rapidly going off the telegraph LOL

I stopped reading the daily fail because of their anti bias and garbage

Now it has gone broadsheet!!!!

In a word

Eejits!!!

[charliehorse]

That just beggars belief

[maytwin]

Lost for words pretty much sums it up for me too, though I do like what Dr Brad Rodu had to say about it, particularly the last 2 paragraphs.

[djs]

Hold on a minute.

Aren't 99.9% of e-cig users going to find it a bit hard to buy some Charlie from their local B&M?

Next they'll discover that the mice in my garden who eat grass seed have started a Reggae cafe and are promoting Ganja sessions.

[igual]

I wonder if the mice preferred custard or fruit flavourd cocaine and did the use 18350 mech mods or get the mice puffing on a 20000 series mod

This story beggars belief at appaling journalism.
What's the bet these reaserchers are either happy clappy brigade or funded by big pharma/tobacco

[Ripshod]

It's about the nicotine then? So the same can be said for cigarettes?

Like conventional cigarettes, the devices are said to raise the risk of addiction to banned substances such as cannabis and cocaine.

Oh, they do lol

Every time they come up with crap like this they always add that it's also true for government approved cancer sticks, kinda killing their own argument. They should add the nicotine patches and other nicotine alternatives to these arguments.

[Cousin Itt]

On the NHS website

[Ripshod]

Sept 4, 2014 16:31:34 GMT Cousin Itt said:

On the NHS website

Good on 'em
Columbia University hypothesizing again (spit)

[colli]

my first look at wiki shows his conflict of interests, Now i dont believe everything in wiki but there is too much there to asume he is not in the BP pockets..

"quoted from site"

Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI)[edit]
As of June 2013, as disclosed in publications in Annals of Internal Medicine, British Journal of Psychiatry, and JAMA Lieberman’s disclosure of financial conflict of interest is on file with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). ICMJE disclosure and review includes FCOI categories: research grants/industry ties, consulting and honorarium, participation in Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMB), provision of research meds or equipment, writing/royalties, administrative support, expert testimony, speakers bureaus, patents, stocks and stock options, travel.[5]

A note on "competing interests" for contributors to the book Essentials of Schizophrenia (2011) says Lieberman receives no direct financial compensation for his research, consulting and advisory board activities (except Intra-Cellular Therapies [which has no asterisk]).[6]

In 2006, Lieberman co-signed a letter to the editor of The Wall Street Journal with about thirty other doctors. With this, he disclosed honoraria, consulting fees, research grant support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Upjohn Pharmacia, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Hoechst AG, and AstraZeneca. He also listed as corporate speakers bureaus AstraZeneca, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer.[7] Lieberman disclosed in 2007 in the journal Primary Psychiatry that he was a consultant to Eli Lilly and Pfizer. He was on the advisory boards of AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Lundbeck, Organon, and Pfizer. He has a patent from Repligen Corporation. Lieberman received research support from Acadia, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Organon, and Pfizer.[8] In 2009, Lieberman disclosed grants from Allon, Forest Laboratories, Merck, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cephalon, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Otsuka, Solvay, and Wyeth to the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology for their annual meeting in which he participated.[9] In 2011, his disclosure at Medscape of relevant financial relationships says he served on the advisory board of Bioline, GlaxoSmithKline, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, and Psychogenics, and that he received research grants from Allon Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sepracor, and Targacept.[10] He also disclosed in 2013, as a member of the psychiatry editorial board at Medscape, that he received research grants from Allon, Novartis, Sepracor, and Targacept; and he served on the advisory boards at Bioline, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Pierre Fabre and Psychogenics.[11] In additional disclosures at Medscape in 2013, he received research grants from Allon, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Psychogenics, Hoffmann-La Roche, Sepracor, and Targacept, and he served on the advisory board of Alkermes, Bioline, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Pierre Fabre, and Psychogenics.[12]

[djs]

Sept 4, 2014 16:12:35 GMT Ripshod said:

It's about the nicotine then? So the same can be said for cigarettes?

Like conventional cigarettes, the devices are said to raise the risk of addiction to banned substances such as cannabis and cocaine.

Oh, they do lol

OK - so smoking also leads to cocaine use.

But not alcohol or working for the BBC?

[VapingBad]

Sept 4, 2014 16:31:34 GMT Cousin Itt said:

On the NHS website

[JayJ]

Researchers ? I researched something online last night online, does that make me a researcher ? Would my personal conclusions be regarded as factual ? I doubt it.

What worries me more than the "researcher" is the gullibility of any reader that takes this printed garbage as factual. These are the people who will be the first line of people objecting to our right to vape. The people complaining in pubs, parks, train stations etc.

Whoever decided that this article was fit for print should be sent do some lines as punishment, public schoolboy idiot style lines (pun massively intended) Something along the lines of.

"I should stop being a total prick and actually employ somebody to do some real fact finding research and actually print the truth"

[VapingBad]

They should read this: Sir Paul Nurse (The president of the Royal Society) criticises those WHO* distort scientific evidence
(* = my emphasis)

We could just take the way out and go on Champix, the MHRA seems to be finding out what the commuinity knew from ages MHRA warns about possible suicide link with Champix