Recent Posts

So you want to mix wholesale? 100ml of concentrate will make 1ltr minimum. why not try here,
www.vaporbreak.com/en/home/232-hangsen-tobacco-50-ml-cheapest.html#/hangsen_tobacco_nicotine_levels-high_24mg/hangsen_tobacco-red_usa_mix_red_malboro

I've been buying from here for 3 months. You just need to steep them for a couple of weeks.

Cheaper at vaporBreak,

www.vaporbreak.com/en/49-calabash

well??? I'd never heard of the commission on human medicines but a quick google tells me it's the MHRA so now she thinks the mhra is the government?

Jules posted about this but it's worth its own thread. The daily fail have nicked an article from the french magazine '60M consumers', published by the French Institute for Consumer Affairs (a better translation than what the DF printed).
The original piece shows no evidence whatsoever for its claims and has been rightly condemned by its french readership.
Claims that ecigs contain 1)formaldehyde and 2)acrolein may be true but as
1) formaldehyde exists in the human body naturally and in the air we breathe and food we eat (like nicotine) nobody else has been able to measure what come out of an ecig.
2) acrolein is a product of heating fats, oils or glycol and can be easily extracted by burning your chip oil!
I can only imagine that whoever did this research tested the ecigs to destruction by dry burning without a battery cut off to obtain the results they wanted

"Imagine a world in which the 1 billion people currently smoking cigarettes were ‘vaping’ electronic cigarettes instead. The death toll would be cut from more than 5 million to perhaps a few tens of thousands at most. E-cigarettes allow vapers to get their nicotine fix in a much purer form without all the carcinogens and poisons in tobacco smoke. Smokers and vapers typically inhale about 20mg of nicotine per day and at that dose it is probably no more harmful than a few cups of coffee. We know this because millions of lifelong users of the smokeless tobacco product ‘snus’ in Sweden get similar doses of nicotine with nothing like the harm that smokers experience.



So what is to prevent the advent of e-cigarettes from being perhaps the single most important public health breakthrough this century?

First the tobacco industry. I presume they don’t want to kill millions of people but they would clearly rather do this than see a fall in their profits. They are buying up e-cigarette companies but unless it turns out to be in their interest to get people using these instead of smoking, they will do everything they can to keep them to a small niche market. They might even see them as a way to get more people smoking cigarettes, for example as a ‘gateway’ product to smoking for young people.

Second, well-intentioned tobacco control advocates and regulators. Belief that any form of nicotine addiction is as bad as any other and concern that e-cigarette users might be exposed to harmful levels of nicotine or other toxins has already led to e-cigarettes in effect being banned in some countries and to other jurisdictions to consider regulating them in such a way that they will not be a viable alternative to smoking.

What do I think? I think this is too good an opportunity to miss. Of course regulation should ensure minimum manufacturing and labelling standards, but it should also be used to nurture their development as an alternative to smoking and an opportunity to legislate cigarettes out of existence." - Prof. Robert West.

This was written by the head of the research group that came up with that report on the NHS quit smoking efforts.

Nice One.