Recent Posts

i feel you on this Collie.  I always like to roll sleeveless whenever possible

we can still debate though mate

The question is, how many of the group of vendors could afford the legal fees to challenge, not many I would bet.

Its the same as saying every company who sells 15ml of premium eliquid for £14.99 are ripping everyone off.

The stand down of support from vapors for these campaigns will lead to the closure of 90% of vendors, ones that we both love and hate. This will lead to you paying 9 quid a day for some shite e-cig that leads you back into smoking, or covered in patches.

Either that or you'll be waiting for your shipment from China, hoping that customs don't impound it and that your postman doesn't grass you up to the feds. You will be vaping in a black jump suit, wearing a balaclava, down some dimly lit back alley.

will take 60 notes for the SX mini.

I'm robbing my own house here

I was well impressed with neilg. He sent me some money, I sent him the produce.

I enjoyed spending neils money.

Thanks neil, top bloke

I disagree totally with this.

TW are over priced, I don't use them BUT

The marketing strategy, B&M shops etc have introduced a lot of people to vaping.  This is a good thing no matter if they are over priced or not

Marketing costs money, I think they showed a lot of balls to attack the market on a grandish scale.

The court-case and their fight against bans will help all of us.  No disrespect but a sizable company with some financial clout will command more respect and have a greater chance of getting their issues across than some web based shop

Also as a side note, who cares if they are trying to protect their assets?  wouldn't you?  I would

the vanila bean has death in it, it has been posted in this thread.

Sorry but it aint worth parting with this world for the sake of a milkshake