chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 10, 2014 0:06:13 GMT
Ooh ya tempting me chris86.....the spider on the magneto is bad enough.... Can I think about it for a day? Very tempted.......Can never have enough sub £30 mechanicals me No problem (and no pressure)....I couldn't get round to posting it until next week anyway. I'd also be happy with a trade if you prefer (but not for another mech mod!)....To be honest I just want to get rid of it, because I'd much rather stick to the vv devices that I know and love. (yes, I know, I'm a terrible salesman! )
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 9, 2014 23:57:26 GMT
Does anyone need me to make some midnight sugar cookies now I've had my meds LOL I have the magneto (never tried the nemesis. Anyone in the UK do them?) and I love it. Fine good quality mech mod. Not been out of my hand since the weekend JAne Justvape sell the Nemesis clones: www.justvape.co.uk/product/nemesis-mod-clone/ . That's where I got mine, but I don't really get on with mechs (see my post above) so if you would like to buy it from me I'd happily sell it to you for £20 shipped. I've had it for less than a month and it's in good condition, with one tiny (almost invisible) ding on it. I'm pretty new here and haven't done any trades or sales, so if you're interested I'd be happy to send it to you and wait until you've received it for payment. I should also point out that you can probably get a brand new one for a little under £20 from Fasttech.
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 9, 2014 23:26:00 GMT
I got a Nemesis clone recently and I don't get on with it, but that's probably because I've realised that mechs just aren't my thing. I bought it because it was pretty, and then found out that it took me about two hours to take it apart and screw it back together. Every time I change the battery, I manage to screw it back together the wrong way, and have repeatedly cut myself on the threads when I've had to force them unstuck. I bought a kick because my clearos were tasting burnt and I wanted to regulate the power, but I can't for the life of me get it to work with the kick. All in all an utter failure.
None of this is a criticism of the Nemesis clone. I'm just pointing out that if you're completely technically inept (like me), then you might be better off sticking to mods that aren't composed of tubes that screw together, and that there aren't many advantages to mechs for people who only use clearos.
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 8, 2014 16:40:25 GMT
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 8, 2014 16:31:29 GMT
You call that naughty? That's positively innocent - angelic even. This is a naughty e-cig!
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 7, 2014 10:35:35 GMT
Congratulations! Here's to many more years of vaping!
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 7, 2014 10:24:37 GMT
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 6, 2014 15:50:25 GMT
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 5, 2014 14:56:05 GMT
My partner is one of those unusual people who has smoked socially for ages without ever getting addicted. She can go for months without having a ciggie and doesn't crave them at all, but she can also get through 2 packets in a night if she feels like it. I, on the other hand, have a hugely addictive personality and neither of us thought that I'd ever go for more than a few hours without fags if I could help it. But then I found vaping, gave up the fags and haven't gone back. She's really quite impressed and has been incredibly supportive - she even doesn't really mind it when I go on a bit of a splurge on new gear. These days, she's more of a social vaper than a social smoker, and really enjoys the dessert flavours (she's got a very sweet tooth!) But she's never been addicted to nicotine, so she isn't getting into vaping in a serious way - she just has a few puffs of something tasty when she feels like it.
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 4, 2014 13:57:40 GMT
Was going to mention my Sentinel clone that was kindly donated to me at the last NEES meet as being bombproof, on another thread ( Blownupdolly ?). It has no magnets, electronics, diamonds, glass, - nothing, except several pieces of machined brass. It has an adjustable centre pin, but this is achieved by the threaded telescoping mechanism. It will take anything from 18350 to kicked 18650, but the threads would show slightly with the latter. Not only would I suggest it as being almost unbreakable, but boy, did I feel safe walking home through the pitch-black woods with a 'nightstick' in my hand (18650 mode). Had to take this photo opportunity, in 18350 mode with protank, just to show its size.
Funny thing is, I'm equally as happy with either displayed mod in my hand - so it's true then, size doesn't matter ps - don't let Super-Shiny see the label on my juice bottle Okay where can I get a sentinel clone in the UK? I googled but no joy. I just got my magneto off Smokshop in Norfolk.....vapes fab ...good job because I think my vamo has just died LOL www.modsandatties.com/gb/home/13-the-sentinel-clone-v3.html. It doesn't have the all brass finish, but it looks like more or less the same thing?.... or....http://www.modsandatties.com/gb/home/21-sentinel-v3.html (this one is all brass) or...http://www.modsandatties.com/gb/home/18-p.html
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 3, 2014 8:56:00 GMT
I think that Titanide and Super T mods come with a lifetime warranty....They definitely aren't cheap (too rich for my blood), but they might just be worth it if you have a habit of breaking things - and they're probably more robust than your average ego
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Jan 3, 2014 8:07:21 GMT
Hi and !
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Dec 31, 2013 16:04:22 GMT
A bad workman might always blame his tools, but I think that manufacturers and vendors haven't got it right if vaping requires hard work and carefully handled tools. My point is that vaping shouldn't be hard work - it's supposed to be recreational and an alternative to smoking. So manufacturers should be looking at ways to minimise the possibility of user error, and I'm not convinced that they are focusing enough on this. To my mind, the pinnacle of vaping technology won't be an incredibly beautifully engineered RBA that allows you to make quintuple nano coils at 0.000001 ohms, but a system that's as simple, consistent and foolproof as a ready made cigarette. Let's face it, taking a cigarette out of a packet, lighting it and inhaling is almost impossible to get wrong. There are no special skills or techniques needed. Rolling tobacco has a learning curve, but smoking can be as easy as lighting a cigarette and inhaling the smoke. I firmly believe that vaping will not replace smoking as the most widespread way of consuming nicotine until there are devices that are equally consistent and immune to user error. Many people aren't interested in learning new techniques - they just want an easy and foolproof way to consume nicotine while cutting out the tobacco, and that's what vaping should ideally offer. I understand that the technology is still in its infancy, but my worry is that manufacturers and vendors are heading in the wrong direction. Instead of trying to design foolproof, consistent and simple devices, they are bringing out new products with more and more advanced features to attract the die-hard enthusiasts. A lot of energy is spent designing RBA's (which require more user input and therefore increase the possibility of user error), while the more basic end of the market is left to Chinese mass production with poor quality control. This will only change if consumers complain and demand foolproof basic devices that minimise the possibility of user error. chris86 we've already got that, they're called cigalikes, take away the excessive claims & they do exactly what they say on the tin, if you want something with a longer run time you could try one of these screwdriver maxi. The guy who sells them has been vaping for around 5yrs & has the same thoughts about simplicity & consistency as you, which I do not mean to imply is a bad thing in any way, & it's why he came up with this, a grown up cigalike. So with that in mind he should be dominating the vaping market - nope by his own admission he has a fairly small but regular customer base which doesn't appear to be growing in any noticeable way, much less have people beating down his door demanding he goes into mass production. Think of vaping like buying a mobile, what people need is something that will make phone calls, what they want is something that will do everything their computer, TV & stereo will do. There is enough choice on the market to suit both camps, but which one do the majority of folks pick even if all they can do is manage to make phone calls with it . . . Consumers want choice & choice means innovation & innovation can mean that you don't always get it right the first time, specially when it's moving at this speed. But if the EU get their way a foolproof, basic, consistent method of delivering nicotine is exactly what we'll get, (ignoring the fact we've already got it in the form of NRT) & that's all we'll get, but at least it'll work, it'll have to to make to the market, so everyone should be happy right. ??? If I were you I'd be careful what you wish for it might come true sooner then you think. Cigalikes are fairly consistent, but they suffer from poor vapour delivery, an inconveniently short battery life and there are a relatively limited range of flavours available. This is why they're less successful in getting people off tobacco than more advanced setups. What I think we need is a device that integrates the superior battery life and vapour delivery of a mod / atty setup, while keeping the foolproof, simple and reliable character of a cigalike. This might not be possible to achieve, but it's what I think manufacturers should be aiming for. I'm aware of Trog and the SD keyring / maxi, and I own an SD keyring. It's a great little device that has suffered from poor marketing - I think that many more people would own one if they had heard of it in the first place. But it still has it's limitations because it uses cartos, which come pre-filled in a very small range of unexciting flavours. Of course users can refill their own cartos, but this reintroduces the need to fiddle and the possibility of user error into the equation. The problem is that the basic devices on the market are very limited in terms of flavour range, battery life and vapour delivery compared to the advanced devices. If you want a device that allows for a wide range of flavours, has a long battery life and delivers a decent amount of vapour, then you have to fiddle and learn new techniques. And many people are reluctant or unable to do this, so they end up going back to the cigarettes. I understand that, much like with mobile phones, some people want all the additional features that come with advanced devices. But there's one key difference between the mobile phone industry and the e-cig industry. Mobile phone companies strive to ensure that even their top of the range devices are ergonomically designed and user-friendly, so that customers can learn to use them without too much effort. But if phones were designed by modders, you wouldn't be able to make a call until you had taken the back of the phone off and used a screwdriver to fiddle with the wiring! I'm not suggesting that we should have better basic devices instead of mods and RBA's. I believe in consumer choice and I'm completely opposed to EU proposals for medical regulation, which would severely restrict that choice. But it seems to me that a lot of energy is going into designing devices which require advanced knowledge in order to operate them, while those who aren't interested in tinkering are left with a second-rate vape. So I think that the 'high-end' designers and manufacturers should also devote some effort to producing improved basic devices that remain user-friendly and foolproof while overcoming the limitations of cigalikes.
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Dec 31, 2013 2:05:30 GMT
Trying to vape like you're still smoking is never going work even with good kit. "a bad workman always blames his tools" springs to mind. & if after this ramble you still don't believe me try & vape your kit like you were smoking a ciggie & see how long it takes to make even the best kit unusable or unsatisfactory. A bad workman might always blame his tools, but I think that manufacturers and vendors haven't got it right if vaping requires hard work and carefully handled tools. My point is that vaping shouldn't be hard work - it's supposed to be recreational and an alternative to smoking. So manufacturers should be looking at ways to minimise the possibility of user error, and I'm not convinced that they are focusing enough on this. To my mind, the pinnacle of vaping technology won't be an incredibly beautifully engineered RBA that allows you to make quintuple nano coils at 0.000001 ohms, but a system that's as simple, consistent and foolproof as a ready made cigarette. Let's face it, taking a cigarette out of a packet, lighting it and inhaling is almost impossible to get wrong. There are no special skills or techniques needed. Rolling tobacco has a learning curve, but smoking can be as easy as lighting a cigarette and inhaling the smoke. I firmly believe that vaping will not replace smoking as the most widespread way of consuming nicotine until there are devices that are equally consistent and immune to user error. Many people aren't interested in learning new techniques - they just want an easy and foolproof way to consume nicotine while cutting out the tobacco, and that's what vaping should ideally offer. I understand that the technology is still in its infancy, but my worry is that manufacturers and vendors are heading in the wrong direction. Instead of trying to design foolproof, consistent and simple devices, they are bringing out new products with more and more advanced features to attract the die-hard enthusiasts. A lot of energy is spent designing RBA's (which require more user input and therefore increase the possibility of user error), while the more basic end of the market is left to Chinese mass production with poor quality control. This will only change if consumers complain and demand foolproof basic devices that minimise the possibility of user error.
|
|
chris86
Full Member
Joined:December 2013
Posts: 190
Location:
Likes: 208
Recent Posts
Last Online Sept 20, 2014 10:27:48 GMT
|
Post by chris86 on Dec 30, 2013 18:42:52 GMT
1. All the shiny expensive mods that take my fancy on a whim 2. All the shiny expensive atomizers that also randomly catch my eye 3. (and this is the most important bit) I'd pay an experienced modder to be a full time live-in rebuilder / polisher / juice filler, so that all I'd have to do is pick up my setup of choice for the day, stick it in my mouth and inhale! But back in the real world, I'm quite happy with my Throathit Twin and eBaron dripper most of the time (just wish the dripper would hold more juice, but then I guess it wouldn't be a dripper!)
|
|