Requirements for the refill mechanism

[Ron]

eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AJOL_2016_101_R_0006


Isn't this what we are using now.Look at Article 2

[nanotm]

Ron


I believe the thing that will be the stumbling block here is the nozzle, a lot of bottle making companies supply different size nozzle tips and very few are what you would call securely fitted (needing dedicated effort to remove them) it will remove dripper bottles and eliminate several products on the market.

it also applies to DIY juices, so regardless of what you mix up or intent to use if your caught out and about with anything other than a TPD compliant 10ml bottle (has required label markings) your possibly going to face prosecution for it, that's a couple of big differences to the original draft's proposed by our own government and is yet another example of the EU riding roughshod over national parliaments /

[Greg]

Apr 18, 2016 12:07:32 GMT nanotm said:

Ron


I believe the thing that will be the stumbling block here is the nozzle, a lot of bottle making companies supply different size nozzle tips and very few are what you would call securely fitted (needing dedicated effort to remove them) it will remove dripper bottles and eliminate several products on the market.

it also applies to DIY juices, so regardless of what you mix up or intent to use if your caught out and about with anything other than a TPD compliant 10ml bottle (has required label markings) your possibly going to face prosecution for it, that's a couple of big differences to the original draft's proposed by our own government and is yet another example of the EU riding roughshod over national parliaments /

How can it apply to DIY juice, that could never be policed. I'd imagine it only applies to ejuice sold to the public and the onus will be on the supplier not the user.

[Bobsbeer]

None of the rules and regs apply to the consumer, we can legally do what we like, and use whatever we want to refill our atties. So you would not face prosecution if out and about, and stopped by the Vaping Police. They might ask you where you purchased it from, but no offence is committed by the consumer.

[jeffc]

Is the EU paying for this supposed `Vaping Police`. If yes hurrah, we never see a policeman where I live.

This post of mine is a jest. Hopefully by 24th June we can stick two fingers up to the EU.

Wonder where I shall put my vote ?

[toots]

"possessing a flow control mechanism that emits no more than 20 drops of refill liquid per minute when placed vertically" - haha, we'd be there all day trying to fill our tanks at that rate

[digicig]

20 drops - at least when i was a newbie (5-6 years ago) equated to 1ml - and as TPD compliant tanks are to be 2ml - shouldn't take that long then

[VapingBad]

Apr 18, 2016 16:39:32 GMT toots said:

"possessing a flow control mechanism that emits no more than 20 drops of refill liquid per minute when placed vertically" - haha, we'd be there all day trying to fill our tanks at that rate

That's just the drip rate if you hold the bottle upside down and don't squeeze.

[Richard46]

Apr 18, 2016 12:07:32 GMT nanotm said:

Ron


I believe the thing that will be the stumbling block here is the nozzle, a lot of bottle making companies supply different size nozzle tips and very few are what you would call securely fitted (needing dedicated effort to remove them) it will remove dripper bottles and eliminate several products on the market.

it also applies to DIY juices, so regardless of what you mix up or intent to use if your caught out and about with anything other than a TPD compliant 10ml bottle (has required label markings) your possibly going to face prosecution for it, that's a couple of big differences to the original draft's proposed by our own government and is yet another example of the EU riding roughshod over national parliaments /

Wrong the TPD is not concerned with possession. Only sales. Lets be concerned about what the TPD actually says which is quite bad enough.

[toots]

Apr 18, 2016 16:47:04 GMT VapingBad said:

Apr 18, 2016 16:39:32 GMT toots said:

"possessing a flow control mechanism that emits no more than 20 drops of refill liquid per minute when placed vertically" - haha, we'd be there all day trying to fill our tanks at that rate

That's just the drip rate if you hold the bottle upside down and don't squeeze.

Oh you kill joy VapingBad I was just having a bit of fun

[nanotm]

Apr 18, 2016 16:48:16 GMT Richard46 said:

Apr 18, 2016 12:07:32 GMT nanotm said:

Ron


I believe the thing that will be the stumbling block here is the nozzle, a lot of bottle making companies supply different size nozzle tips and very few are what you would call securely fitted (needing dedicated effort to remove them) it will remove dripper bottles and eliminate several products on the market.

it also applies to DIY juices, so regardless of what you mix up or intent to use if your caught out and about with anything other than a TPD compliant 10ml bottle (has required label markings) your possibly going to face prosecution for it, that's a couple of big differences to the original draft's proposed by our own government and is yet another example of the EU riding roughshod over national parliaments /

Wrong the TPD is not concerned with possession. Only sales. Lets be concerned about what the TPD actually says which is quite bad enough.

sure I read a line in it about it applying regardless if you produced for personal consumption or sale ...

[Richard46]

Apr 18, 2016 17:03:32 GMT nanotm said:

Apr 18, 2016 16:48:16 GMT Richard46 said:

Wrong the TPD is not concerned with possession. Only sales. Lets be concerned about what the TPD actually says which is quite bad enough.

sure I read a line in it about it applying regardless if you produced for personal consumption or sale ...

Lets see what it says then; I could be wrong. What section was it?