Idiotic nonsense in The Guardian

[barrynorton]

Is 'vaping' really the best word for smoking e-cigarettes?
Smokers must be furious: electronic cigarettes were their big chance to be socially acceptable again. Now look what's happened …

On Monday, e-cigarette makers Gamucci will open the world's first airport "vaping zone" in the Terminal 4 international departure lounge at Heathrow.

If the zone is a success, it'll be seen as a huge victory for the burgeoning e-cigarette industry. But with a name like that it doesn't stand a chance. Vaping zone. Say it out loud. You can't, can you? Someone might be listening, and they'd probably punch you right in your stupid face if they heard you.

Is this what we're supposed to call the act of smoking an electronic cigarette? Vaping? Are e-smokers vapists? Because vaping sounds worryingly like a form of sexual assault, or a bewilderingly ill-advised 1980s dance craze. Smokers must be furious. E-cigarettes were their big chance to become socially acceptable again, but whoever came up with "vaping" has ruined it. What's worse: going outside to smoke, or sitting indoors to vap off?

And, just like actual smoking – hot smoking, as the vapists call it – all sorts of neologisms are bound to spring up around e-cigarettes. What's the vaping equivalent of smirting (smoking and flirting), for example? Is it varting? And what are we to call cigaretiquette (the generalised behaviour surrounding smoking) in the age of e-cigarettes? Vaprotocol? That sounds like a cheap brand of bronchitis medication.

And vaping is just the tip of the awkward e-cigarette terminology iceberg. The website Ecigology (itself a terrible word that deserves to be bludgeoned to death) has a glossary teeming with ridiculous new words and phrases. It's a world of "carts" and "cartos" that you fill with "smoke juice" and accessorise with "a drip tip", being careful not to "flood your atty" and diminish your "throat hit". Imagine being the sort of person who actually talks like this. It'd be like living your entire life inside an Australian remake of A Clockwork Orange directed by Chris Morris.

At least it will work as an inadvertent shot in the arm for anti-smoking campaigners. Forget bold-print health warnings and close-up pictures of diseased lungs, nothing's going to repel you from a packet of cigarettes – electronic or otherwise – like knowing that you'll have to stand in something as ridiculous as a vaping zone to smoke them.

www.theguardian.com/society/shortcuts/2013/nov/24/vaping-smoking-e-cigarettes?commentpage=2

[barrynorton]

Rather we should all stay 'smokists' than new language be developed for new technology

[loobiebloo]

I thought journalists had a background in English to a reasonable level.

[ionian]

A bit of a click bait article by a guy just out of puberty - he can look below the line and say "ooo look at all the angry vapists, aren't they bad and angry people who can't give up smoking LOL".

I generally like the guardian's news coverage, but this sort of thing is usually on my ignore list.

[Raffles]

Don't usually read The Guardian, thought it was meant to be a serious journal.

If it wasn't so sad and dangerous, it could be funny... I'm sure the author asked one of his kids to come up with an article because he was too far gone on the wine, and then actually submitted it. WTH is a 'hot smoking' ???

Do these journalists actually get paid for this tripe?... Some good comments after the article, although the damage has already been done... if we assume a lot of people will actually believe it!

[Perpetua]

It's a cheap shot at trying to make an attention grabbing story.

[jeffc]

FFS we VAPE not SMOKE.Crap researching by an ill informed supposed reporter/researcher.

Why did the `editor` allow such incorrect rubbish to be printed.

We are VAPERS not VAPISTS.

[djs]

Welcome, Vapists of the world.

Oh dear.

This is just a wind up.

[ionian]

The comments are actually pretty funny. Not one person has a good thing to say about the article. But, because it's an incendiary piece, he'll get comments, which generate traffic for the site, which means he'll get to write more articles.

Best thing we can do: don't click on it, don't comment and remember that for every open-minded person in the world there's a special aunt!

[Gary Horder]

Prat .. that is all

[cl0wn]

My god, I expected more from the guardian, I thought it was a spoof, or they'd given a chimp ten minutes on the net to research a 300 word filler article. What lazy "writing", mind you, his brain function must have been affected by all the crap television he blogs about, perhaps he could use some nicotine to help with this.